2022AP91 (2022 WI 64) Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IS AFFIRMED

Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley delivered the majority opinion of the Court with respect to ¶¶4–10, 12–13, 52–63, and 73–85, in which Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justices Patience Drake Roggensack and Brian Hagedorn joined, and an opinion with respect to ¶¶1–3, 11, 14–51, 64–72, 86, n.29, and 87, in which Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Patience Drake Roggensack joined.  Justice Patience Drake Roggensack filed a concurring opinion.  Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley filed a concurring opinion, in which Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Patience Drake Roggensack joined.  Justice Brian Hagedorn filed a concurring opinion.  Justice Ann Walsh Bradley filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Rebecca Frank Dallet and Jill J. Karofsky joined.

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617

2020AP1032 (2022 WI 65) John Doe 1 v. Madison Metro School District

THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS IS AFFIRMED AND THE CAUSE IS REMANDED TO THE CIRCUIT COURT.

Justice Brian Hagedorn delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Frank Dallet, and Jill J. Karofsky joined. Justice Patience Drake Roggensack filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler and Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley joined.

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542618

2021AP1343 & 2021AP1382 (2022 WI 63) Jeffrey Becker v. Dane County

THE ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IS AFFIRMED, AND THE CAUSE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.

Justice Jill J. Karofsky delivered the majority opinion of the Court with respect to ¶¶1-28 and 44-45, in which Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Frank Dallet, and Brian Hagedorn joined, and an opinion with respect to ¶¶29-43, in which Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Frank Dallet joined. Justice Brian Hagedorn filed a concurring opinion. Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler and Justice Patience Drake Roggensack joined.

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542615

2020AP1616-D (2022 WI 66) Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nathan E. DeLadurantey

PER CURIAM.

IT IS ORDERED that, as discipline for his professional misconduct and violation of SCR 40.15, enforced via SCR 20:8.4(g), Nathan E. DeLadurantey is publicly reprimanded.  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order, Nathan E. DeLadurantey shall pay to the Office of Lawyer Regulation $17,570.10 for the costs of this proceeding.  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Lawyer Regulation shall advise this court if Nathan E. DeLadurantey fails to comply with all conditions of this order.  See SCR 22.28(2).

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley filed a concurring opinion.  Justice Brian Hagedorn concurs only in the mandate.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email