Madison, Wis – On Tuesday, during the contested case hearing on the Enbridge Line 5 Relocation Project, certified Senior Professional Wetland Scientist Scott Storlid – who has more than 30 years’ experience as an environmental scientist – confirmed the Line 5 Relocation Project was “one of the most intensively studied projects” he’s ever seen.
Storlid stated, “I have done a lot of corridor projects, and this certainly is one of the most intensively studied projects I’ve ever reviewed. I reviewed this with a team of individuals that have supported me in the past on long linear projects and they all agree with my conclusions. I believe Enbridge has submitted the information initially that was required and that when they were asked to provide additional information, they did so and the DNR had a lot of information. Let’s put it this way: there are over twenty thousand pages of documents associated with this project.”
“I have never seen one (a pipeline project) with a 15-year monitoring period. It is an exceptional commitment especially with adaptive and ongoing adaptive management,” Storlid went on to say.
The contest case hearing continues through October 3, with Enbridge and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources experts testifying on the project over the next two weeks.
The hearing is a result of opponents of the project initiating the “contested case” process challenging the permits issued by the Wisconsin DNR for the Line 5 relocation project. The challenge comes even though the DNR spent more than four years compiling and analyzing data, held multiple public hearings and comment periods, and relied on the most state-of-the-art modeling available to make their decision. A nearly 900-page DNR environmental impact statement scientifically and legally justified the issuance of project permits. The DNR also included 231 conditions on the permits to require the strongest environmental standards possible.
Line 5 is unique because it not only moves crude oil that is refined into transportation fuels, but it also transports natural gas liquids that are made into propane. In fact, a public comment submitted to the DNR by major propane supplier Plains Midstream sent a critical warning that a rejection of the Line 5 relocation project would likely send Wisconsin into a propane state of emergency, leading to supply shortages and massive price increases.
During the Wisconsin DNR’s permitting process, over two dozen of Wisconsin’s leading organizations representing farmers, small businesses, labor unions and papermakers submitted comments in favor of the relocation project. Those groups included the Wisconsin Corn Growers Association, Wisconsin Propane Gas Association, Wisconsin Building Trades Council, Wisconsin Counties Association, Wisconsin Electric Cooperative Association, Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, Wisconsin Independent Businesses, Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group, Wisconsin Laborers’ District Council, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Wisconsin Paper Council, Wisconsin Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association, Wisconsin Pipe Trades, Wisconsin Restaurant Association, Wisconsin Soybean Association, Cooperative Network, Dairy Business Association, Great Lakes Timber Professionals Association, Building Trades Council of South Central Wisconsin, Construction Business Group, International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139, Midwest Food Products Association, North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters, Northern Wisconsin Building and Construction Trades Council and Teamsters Local 346. In fact, an analysis of public records found that Wisconsinites supported the Line 5 relocation project by a 2-to-1 margin during the DNR comment period in 2022.
