MADISON, Wis. — In case you missed it, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel exposed far-left Chris Taylor in a blatant display of political opportunism. Once an advocate for judicial integrity, Taylor has now abandoned her own principles, flip-flopping on a recusal policy she championed as a state legislator. This reversal isn’t the first and won’t be the last.
Back in 2015, Taylor co-sponsored a bill that would have required judges to recuse themselves from cases involving campaign donors who contributed $1,000 or more. Fast forward to her current Supreme Court bid, and Taylor has conveniently dismissed her own proposal as “not workable.” This about-face reeks of hypocrisy, suggesting she’s more interested in amassing campaign cash than upholding the principles she once touted.
Taylor’s campaign is clearly indicating that they want to ensure they have access to the big donors and special interests that far-left Susan Crawford had. This reversal is a calculated move to keep the money flowing, free from the constraints of her own recusal rules. Taylor’s willingness to bend her principles for political gain once again shows she is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
This isn’t the first time Taylor’s actions have raised eyebrows. Her track record includes opposing victims’ rights measures, such as Marsy’s Law, which aimed to strengthen protections for crime victims. She’s also been closely tied to far-left groups as a legislator, proving that her judicial decisions would reflect a radical liberal agenda.
As the 2026 election approaches, Taylor’s flip-flop on recusal rules serves as a stark reminder of the stakes. Taylor’s record and reversals suggest she’s more interested in advancing a left-wing agenda than ensuring justice remains blind.
